More Informations
online-survey about the 11-Digit (IATA) MAWB –with focus on an individual Piece-ID

 

Home

     German Version

      

About the author:  

Carlheinz Schorr is working since 20 years for one of the leading companies in the Express business with an special focus on airfreight.

 http://cmrs.de/head2.jpg

About the survey:

The survey is part of a Master thesis of an extra occupational master study with emphasis on logistics.

 

About the background of the initial problem:

Without an individual piece identifier (=Piece-ID) it is not explicit possible to locate a single piece of an multi-piece shpt.

Airline systems do also normally a mathematical even break down weight wise then.

Example: On these systems then each single piece of a 2 piece shpt with 100kg in total would weight 50kg. Although in reality the weights might be different, like 1 piece is only 10kg and the other piece 90 kg.

This method has therefore some mostly unpleasant sideeffects for the Shipper/Consignee as well as for the involved Airline or transportation company.

Eg.:

-Customs will be calculated on the (wrong) weight part.

-Claims could often not be linked to the correct piece(s) because of this.

-Compensations for Claims might be wrongly calculated (if based on weight of damaged/missing pieces)

-Burden of proof is difficult.

-POD’s / Proof of deliveries are not distinct.

-etc.

 

The IATA has planned to approach this problem in their Cargo 2000 Imitative –it was incorporated into their "Phase 3 Strategy" to be precise - however that has not come to pass.

 

They did develop a series of CIMP piece level tracking messages for this purpose back in 2000 but these have not been implemented by the industry as yet.

 

These messages would be:

PIECE MANIFEST (FPM) MESSAGE

PIECE STATUS REQUEST (FPR) MESSAGE

PIECE STATUS ANSWER (FPA) MESSAGE

PIECE STATUS UPDATE (FPU) MESSAGE

 

It was envisioned that this piece identifier would be included in the bar coded label following the air waybill number. In accordance with this a changed IATA resolution was made. See excerpt from IATA Resolution 600a:

 

Primary Bar Code (Air Waybill/Piece Number Information)

A primary bar code, of sixteen continuous numeric

characters, in which the encoded data shall comprise the following fields:

= the three-digit numeric airline prefix;

= the eight-digit numeric air waybill number;

= a single digit separator (shall always be zero);

= a four-digit numeric unique piece number, indicating each individual piece in a multi-piece shipment.

If this field is not used, it shall comprise four zeros;

 

Unfortunately the industry has only implemented and stuck with the last sentence above and it comprises four zeroes. (As ad-on to the 11 digit MAWB)

 

This means on the other hand also, that with this method “only” a max of 9999 single pieces per MAWB could be linked / identified. (or 10000, if you also count the „0000“ as piece number) 

 

Additional to this, there are some other methods / standards available -or already in use- in the industry. Like the „license plate number” (=A combination of letters & digits) , which would however also require more than 4 digits as well as for example the „GS1 Serial Shipment Container Code (SSCC)”.

 

Links for „license plate number”:

http://www.infosight.com/wp-lpn.htm

http://de.slideshare.net/martintreder16/license-plate-the-iso-standard-for-transport-package-identifiers

Links for „SSCC”:

http://www.gs1.org/barcodes/technical/idkeys/sscc

http://www.gs1-128.info/sscc-18